On 10/02/23 a Tucker Carlson on X webisode featured political commentator Victor Davis Hanson analyzing the state of American politics.
In response this account generated an informal essay. It consists of a lengthy collection of related points ascertained during media aggregation and documentation that was inspired by Hanson’s discussion.
In an effort to document media discourse under the protection provided for citizen journalists by freedom of the press, and because it far exceeds the character limit of other mediums, it is published below in long form for dissemination as:
10 Seconds of Freedom
In the 10 seconds of freedom left it could be argued that through evidence acquired by investigational forensic accounting techniques colloquial political terms (ie, Democrat, liberal, left leaning, progressive, social) have been culturally appropriated by an element that is currently representative of the "Democratic CCP". If research revealed that 5th Generational, or Unrestricted Warfare, as outlined by the CCP military in the "Unrestricted War" doctrine, has been deployed against the United States the paradigm of current events could change.
On the surface it appears American voices are giving rise to actions that appear to be part of a democratic political practice but could actually be the offensive tactics utilized by a foreign government to achieve regime change. It is a practice that the United States has utilized in warfare. It appears as a "Color Revolution".
It is deployed through a subtle variety of methods that operate under the shield of "virtue signals" (ie, the greater good, social justice, climate change) but are actually counterintuitive to the issues they claim. It is the story of an Oil producing company replacing board directors with those that are in favor of phasing out "fossil fuel". It should raise eyebrows, at the least.
Essentially, it is a hollow shell used as camouflage to avoid the legal ramifications of foreign interference in American legislative processes. A key technique is to foment domestic strife through amplification of intersectional conflict, as opposed to integrative resolution--divide then conquer. It is the political expression of the most sound martial arts application. Redirect the strength of an opponent to cause them to inflict their own injury.
The intent is to effect governmental change--a litigated coup. The goal is to weaken a nation. It is nearly impossible to subjugate a country with a fierce independent spirit who laws protectively acknowledge their God given freedom unless their will is broken. One prominent example has been referred to as changing the constitution by NOT prosecuting the law to effect precedent . The precedent is then used to bolster legislative change.
It also appears as codified legislation of abhorrent behaviors but it is generally the removal of speech through punitive measures for unapproved terms or descriptions. Politically Correct speech has escalated into enforcement of "pronouns". Thought crime is now prosecuted through the enactment of these small legal changes. Subsequently, the intention to categorize them as Felonies has been telegraphed.
A change of perspective elucidates an anomaly that provides evidence of these actions: prosecution of violent street crime is deferred in favor of the "holistic" alternatives of social justice while disobeying mandated linguistics is tantamount to "crimes against humanity". Non-compliance of speech must be met with merciless legal retaliation under this ideology. Decarceration is not advocated for those that misgender.
It is of little consequence that the stated syntax defies rudimentary biological concepts that are observed across ethnicities and has timeless origins. It is, however, a consequential violation of free and protected speech. Precedents that nullify existing laws and guarantees are actually a stealth regime change. After the semantics are extracted it is behavior modification by domestic laws in a foreign effort to regiment a totalitarian control of US citizens in violation of their rights.
It could be coined a "Paper Cut Coup". Death by a thousand, as the adage goes.
The desperate attempt to implement immediate ambiguous "emergency" measures in the name of "Climate Change" (CC) is another primary example. Despite the Project Veritas video of a CNN producer clearly stating that the CC theory will be used to increase viewership when the dominance of the Covid narrative dies down, which provides evidence it is solely a tool of control, CC remains unquestioned in its demand for absolute omnipotent authority.
Yet, the breadth of the conditions that seek redress through "emergency powers", cite a plethora of diverse arguments in favor of suspending traditional US law. Each "existential crisis" advocates for the removal of property and rights in a manner antithetical to the notion of the "American Dream". It lends credence to the observations that these articulations are a ruse to achieve a means to an end.
The current pattern of invoking crisis is evident. Never let a good one go to waste. It appears to hyperbolically appropriate a condition to manipulate legislative bodies. A populace is subsequently denigrated into submission by reactive lawmakers. It is a strategy to topple the nation by, "gaming the system".
Viewed through a technical perspective it may be the use of the "lawfare" element of "Unrestricted Warfare" for "America" to prosecute US citizens through foreign interference in domestic affairs.
It also a tool that can be wielded by international bodies working under the behest of CCP initiatives such as the United Nations and World Health Organization, as well as the technocratic "globalist" World Economic Forum which exerts additional foreign interference to install agenda. Additionally, these bodies employ the use of treaties that can supersede US sovereignty after they satisfy minor legal requirements for US approval. These are the sources and methods of the totalitarianism Hanson noted in his discussion.
Essentially, CC is analogous to ESG standards. Both are a form of the CCP Social Credit Score. Ultimately, each is being used to ensure a transition of "voluntary compliance" into a full surveillance state devoid of free will and personal autonomy. Human rights will no longer exist.
A distinct attribute which makes the regime change process transparent is the comparison to the spirit of the classic American justice system. Juxtaposing the initiatives of cadres of nebulously funded organizations to relentlessly prosecute mass lawsuits against a single individual allows an intention to be discerned. While Critical Theory is a legal argument to justify the political process of asset redistribution and appropriation US prosecutions generally aren't initiated in an effort to deprive constitutional rights. Traditionally, they are meant to focus on an offense.
"Lawfare" style prosecutions appear intended to achieve one or more of the following:
a) Distract from further observations of interference being articulated by the defendant (ie, influence/interference by CCP/Global bodies)
b) Remove speech
c) Remove assets (through the immense expense of mass criminal/civil prosecution, punitive applications of court decisions)
d) Impede resistance to initiative/mandates through civil/criminal punishment
If the intention of a prosecution is to conduct "lawfare" to stop observation it is an overt act to evade detection of a pre-planned course of actions to effect a specific goal.
-What conduct is being hidden?
-Who is conducting the acts?
- Who is ensuring they avoid detection?
Traditional legal ramifications for organized efforts between two or more people to facilitate foreign interference into American governance are starkly different than those that referee domestic political quarrels.
If current strife can be made to appear as a hyperbolic emotional conclusion of a nation that is drifting little recourse could be claimed. If, however, evidence obtained by investigative reporting led to the understanding that a stealth plan of usurpation was deployed, open source intelligence techniques such as documentation and analysis by every American could corroborate the implementation. The paradigm change is established. A knowledge base is accessible for further investigation.
Simply put, each "citizen journalist" could access open source intelligence to obtain official documents to compare to initiatives that include, but are not limited to: media reporting, press releases, policy papers and changes of legislation. In an effort to educate themself, as well as others. Due to the technocratic censorship measures already implemented this can be challenging but it is not impossible.
The aforementioned international sources, as well as domestic organizations, have sought to conceal information. Search engines are biased, articles are stealth edited retroactively, evidentiary documents are removed or delegitimized by “fact checkers”, among other tactics, at the request of the federal government as revealed by discovery obtained in lawsuits such as: Missouri vs. Biden and Berenson vs. Twitter.
After obtaining a primer on 5th Generational Warfare the task becomes easier. These guides are currently being published by former American military operators tasked to recognize and mitigate them. A multitude of resources like O’Keefe Media Group offer glimpses into journalism protocols and ethics for beginners to consider. A little digging during lunch goes a long way.
It is already being done by many but most aren’t documenting their results. It is vitally important to bring awareness to correlations because they circumvent plausible deniability and are actionable. An effective method does not require any commentary, interpretation or assumption of motive. It compiles the documents in a post without rhetoric and lets the changes speak on their own behalf. Essentially, "a picture is worth a thousand words". Screenshot and go.
When these results are posted to mediums such as Twitter, Truth, Gettr, Gab, Facebook, Instagram, Substack, Telegram, Frank Speech, banned.video, Rumble, Youtube, Brighteon, Bitchute and any other social media followings it allows "Independent Journalists" to use the records for investigative reporting and disseminates them. Utilizing a variety of mediums ensures continuity of information against censorship. Publish often, and everywhere.
If law enforcement, or governmental bodies, commenced an investigation into the pattern of legal system anomalies it is possible that evidence that statutes were violated may be discovered. If it appeared that a doctrine of “Unrestricted Warfare” has been deployed against the United States a more rigorous investigation would be warranted. Expansive avenues of investigation such as forensic accounting, open source intelligence, discovery from legal process, as well as more invasive methods like subpoenas and search warrants for digital and physical evidence could yield important results.
If the paradigm does change it may prove that current political turmoil is not the natural consequent failure of a "great experiment".
In the time that is left for voices to freely utilize their protected speech it is important for every citizen to ensure through their own research and investigation, conducted in accordance with the protection provided by freedom of the press, that foreign interference in domestic American affairs isn’t operating to remove the liberties of the United States.
For your information.
Excellent article. I'll need to read it again. The whole nefarious mechanism by which these cretins try to nullify our Constitution by claiming spurious "precedent", or amend the Constitution by mere statutory law or treaty, is at the core. Very subtle, and treasonous.
I believe that in an open, well-debated contest between the supremacy of the Constitution vs a treaty, that the Constitution will be found to be superior in authority to ANY treaty! They do not have equivalent stature.
These evil ones use the law to subvert the law, nullify the true law, ad nauseum.